BOYCE v. BOYCE

No. 8015SC838.

276 S.E.2d 494 (1981)

Ruth BOYCE, Petitioner, v. Robert S. BOYCE, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

April 7, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hogue & Strickland by Lucy D. Strickland, Hillsborough, for petitioner-appellant.

Haywood, Denny & Miller by James H. Johnson, III and Michael W. Patrick, Chapel Hill, for respondent-appellant.


WEBB, Judge.

The threshold question in this case is whether the order dismissing the petitioner's second claim for relief is appealable. It is not a final judgment since all claims have not been determined. It involves multiple claims but the superior court has not made a finding that there is no just reason for delay. For that reason, it is not appealable under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 54(b). A substantial right of the petitioner has been affected, but we do not believe it...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases