1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 526 F.Supp.
  5. 526 F.Supp. 234 (1981)
 

METAL TRANSPORT CORP. v. CANADIAN TRANSPORT CO.

No. 81 Civ. 5873.

526 F.Supp. 234 (1981)

METAL TRANSPORT CORP., as Charterer, Plaintiff, v. CANADIAN TRANSPORT CO., a Division of MacMillan Bloedel Limited, as Disponent Owner of the M/V EVERJUST, Defendant.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

November 17, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Burlingham, Underwood & Lord, New York City, for plaintiff; Michael Marks Cohen, Walter H. Hinton II, New York City, of counsel.

Kirlin, Campbell & Keating, New York City, for defendant; Jeffrey M. Aquilante, New York City, of counsel.

OPINION

EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.

Defendant Canadian Transport Co., a Canadian corporation, moves to vacate an attachment of its bank account on the grounds that it could have been "found" within this district and therefore there was no basis for the attachment under Rule B of the Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims and additionally because plaintiff failed to file prompt notice...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases