1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 397 So.2d
  5. 397 So.2d 347 (1981)
 

BAUCOM v. BAUCOM

Nos. 79-2381, 79-2390 and 79-2430.

397 So.2d 347 (1981)

Ruby D. BAUCOM, Etc., et al., Appellants, v. Phillip E. BAUCOM, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Rehearing Denied May 8, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sinclair, Louis, Siegel, Heath, Nussbaum & Zavertnik and John L. Zavertnik and Paul A. Louis, Stabinski, Funt, Levine & Vega and Regina F. Zelonker, Miami, for appellants.

Smathers & Thompson and Hugh J. Turner, Jr. and Cromwell A. Anderson and Keith Hope, Miami, for appellee.

Before HUBBART, C.J., and BASKIN and PEARSON, DANIEL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

With respect to the wife's former attorneys Sinclair, Louis, Siegel & Heath, we affirm the orders appealed from upon a holding that: (a) the settlement agreement herein was entered into in good faith by the respective parties herein with no intent to defraud the said attorneys of their fees, thereby making the rule stated in Miller v. Scobie, 152 Fla. 328, 11 So.2d 892 (1943) inapplicable; see e.g., Sentco, Inc. v. McCulloh,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases