GOODMAN v. LINN-CORRIHER CORP.

No. 8010IC883.

281 S.E.2d 458 (1981)

Mae GOODMAN v. LINN-CORRIHER CORPORATION Self-Insured.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

September 1, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hassell & Hudson by Charles R. Hassell, Jr., Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellee.

Alexander & Brown by B. S. Brown, Jr., Kannapolis, and Constangy, Brooks & Smith, Atlanta, Ga., by Daniel P. Murphy, Atlanta, Ga., for defendant-appellant.


WHICHARD, Judge.

Defendant's first contention is that the record contains no competent evidence to support the finding that plaintiff was totally disabled from the occupational disease byssinosis. We disagree. The record contains testimony by plaintiff as to the dusty conditions of her work place over a period of years; as to her resultant respiratory difficulties; and as to her having "stopped working ... because it was getting harder and harder breathing." It contains...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases