1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 641 F.2d
  5. 641 F.2d 90 (1981)
 

CONSOLIDATED EXPRESS v. NEW YORK SHIPPING ASS'N

Nos. 78-1529, 78-1530.

641 F.2d 90 (1981)

CONSOLIDATED EXPRESS, INC., Appellant, v. NEW YORK SHIPPING ASSOCIATION, INC.; Sealand Service, Inc.; Seatrain Lines, Inc.; International Longshoremen's Association, AFL-CIO; International Terminal Operating Co., Inc.; John M. McGrath Corp.; Pittston Stevedoring Corp.; United Terminals Corp.; Universal Maritime Services Corp., Appellees. and TWIN EXPRESS, INC., Appellant, v. NEW YORK SHIPPING ASSOCIATION, INC.; Sealand Service, Inc.; International Longshoremen's Association, AFL-CIO; International Terminal Operating Co., Inc.; John M. McGrath Corp.; Pittston Stevedoring Corp.; United Terminals Corp.; Universal Maritime Services Corp., Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Opinion Filed February 13, 1981.

As Amended February 19, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John A. Ridley, Crummy, Del Deo, Dolan & Purcell, Newark, N. J., Richard A. Whiting (argued), Ellen M. McNamara, Clifford G. Holderness, Steptoe & Johnson, Washington, D. C., for Consolidated Express, Inc. and Twin Express, Inc.

Jeffrey Reiner, Meyner, Landis & Verdon, Newark, N. J., James W. B. Benkard (Argued), Davis Polk & Wardwell, New York City, for Sea-Land Service, Inc.

Thomas W. Gleason, New York City, for International Longshoremen's Association, AFL-CIO; Ernest L. Mathews, Jr., New York City (Argued), of counsel.

Michael S. Waters, Carpenter, Bennett & Morrissey, Newark, N. J., C. P. Lambos, Donato Caruso (Argued), Lorenz, Finn, Giardino & Lambos, New York City, for New York Shipping Association, Inc., International Terminal Operating Co., Inc., John W. McGrath Corp., Pittston Stevedoring Corp. and Universal Maritime Service Corp.

Before SEITZ, C. J., and GIBBONS and WEIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion on Remand from the Supreme Court of the U. S. Filed February 13, 1981.

OPINION OF THE COURT

GIBBONS, Circuit Judge:

We deal here with the proper course to be followed in complying with the mandate of the Supreme Court vacating our prior judgment and remanding an appeal to us for further consideration in light of NLRB v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n, 447 U.S. 490, 100 S.Ct. 2305, 65 L.Ed.2d 289...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases