1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 126 Cal.App.3d
  5. 126 Cal.App.3d 603 (1981)
 

IRAM ENTERPRISES v. VEDITZ

Docket No. 61648.

126 Cal.App.3d 603 (1981)

179 Cal. Rptr. 1

IRAM ENTERPRISES et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. PAUL VEDITZ et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

November 16, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Cheong & Denove and Drew R. Antablin for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Hecht, Diamond & Greenfield and Roger Jon Diamond for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

LILLIE, Acting P.J.

(1) (See fn. 1.) Plaintiffs appeal from judgment of dismissal entered after demurrer to their first amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend.1

The defendants in this action are five individuals and a corporation (Highlands Insurance Company). The first amended complaint contains three causes of action. The first cause of action (malicious prosecution...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases