1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 663 F.2d
  5. 663 F.2d 65 (1981)
 

DANZL v. NO. ST. PAUL-MAPLEWOOD-OAKDALE IND. SCH.

No. 81-1020.

663 F.2d 65 (1981)

Agnes A. DANZL, Appellee, v. NORTH ST. PAUL-MAPLEWOOD-OAKDALE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 622; Dr. Carl Midjass, individually and in his capacity as Director, Personnel and Management Services for North St. Paul-Maplewood-Oakdale Independent School District No. 622; Dr. Richard St. Germain, individually and in his capacity as Director of Secondary Education for North St. Paul-Maplewood-Oakdale Independent School District No. 622; North St. Paul-Maplewood-Oakdale Independent School District No. 622 School Board; Bette Jayne Haak, individually and in her capacity as School Board member; T. Geron Bell, individually and in his capacity as School Board member; Bruce L. Beck, individually and in his capacity as School Board member; William Lester, individually and in his capacity as School Board member; G. Paul Sandberg, individually and in his capacity as School Board member; Charles W. Wiger, individually and in his capacity as School Board member; and Robert Hansen, individually and in his capacity as School Board member, Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided November 12, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peterson, Popovich, Knutson & Flynn by Thomas M. Sipkins (argued), Peter S. Popovich, St. Paul, Minn., for appellants.

Oakes & Kanatz by Judith L. Oakes (argued), Viola M. Kanatz, St. Paul, Minn., for appellee.

Before LAY, Chief Judge, and HEANEY, BRIGHT, ROSS, STEPHENSON, HENLEY, McMILLIAN, and ARNOLD, Circuit Judges, en banc.

PER CURIAM.

Agnes A. Danzl brought this action against the defendant school district claiming it had declined to hire her as a high-school principal because of her sex, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. The District Court entered judgment for plaintiff, and the school district appealed. A panel of this court, one judge dissenting, affirmed the District Court. Danzl v. North St. Paul-Maplewood-Oakdale...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases