1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 177 N.J.
  5. 177 N.J. Super. 551 (1981)
 

STATE v. TANCHALK

177 N.J. Super. 551 (1981)

427 A.2d 118

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ANDREW TANCHALK AND JOSEPH ZENTE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 2, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elmer J. Herrman argued the cause for appellants (Herrman & Blasi, attorneys).

Mark H. Genser, Assistant Essex County Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (John J. Degnan, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Donald S. Coburn, Essex County Prosecutor, of counsel).

Before Judges BOTTER, KING and McELROY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by BOTTER, P.J.A.D.

The question on appeal to be discussed is whether the recording of a wiretap authorized under N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-14 must be sealed at the conclusion of the initial wiretap order or at the conclusion of the entire interception when that order has been renewed or extended by a subsequent order.

Defendants and others were indicted for engaging in a conspiracy to violate the gambling laws and for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases