The only issue presented on this appeal is whether the board properly discharged the Special Fund for Reopened Cases from liability for compensation benefits awarded claimant. Appellants argue that there was a final closing of claimant's case by notice of decision dated February 21, 1975, and that an application to reopen the case was made after the period set forth in section 25-a of the Workers' Compensation Law had run. We disagree. The decision of the board should be...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
