LOOMIS v. CORINNO CORP.


54 N.Y.2d 18 (1981)

Julia Loomis, Appellant, v. Civetta Corinno Construction Corp., Respondent, et al., Defendants. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided October 22, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence N. Chanen and Allen A. Hans for appellant.

Robert Markewich and Gary Brown for respondent.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur.


GABRIELLI, J.

It has been the rule in New York that a party cannot recover more in a monetary judgment than is requested in his demand for relief (see, e.g., Michalowski v Ey, 7 N.Y.2d 71, 75). Today we re-examine this principle and conclude that a motion made by a plaintiff to increase the amount of relief requested in the ad damnum clause of the complaint, whether...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases