OLYMPIC INS. CO. v. EMPLOYERS SURPLUS LINES INS.

Docket No. 46576.

126 Cal.App.3d 593 (1981)

178 Cal. Rptr. 908

OLYMPIC INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. EMPLOYERS SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant; RALPH ROKEBY-JOHNSON et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

December 8, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Popelka, Allard, McCowan & Jones, Philip R. McCowan and Michael G. Ackerman for Plaintiff and Appellant.

LaFollette, Johnson, Schroeter & De Haas, B.E. Atkisson and Alfred W. Gerisch, Jr., for Defendant and Appellant.

Hancock, Rothert & Bunshoft and Harlow P. Rothert for Defendants and Respondents.


OPINION

ANELLO, J.*

This is an appeal from a judgment in an action for declaratory relief. The question presented is whether the trial court erred in holding an excess insurer liable where the primary insurance has not been exhausted.

Plaintiff is the Olympic Insurance Company (hereinafter Olympic). In 1967, Olympic had a general insurance agency contract with Landseair under which Landseair was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases