MUNOZ-MENDOZA v. PIERCE

Civ. A. No. 80-2589-C.

520 F.Supp. 180 (1981)

Viviana MUNOZ-MENDOZA, Maggie Morris, Arturo Juarbe, Pat Quintana, Marcia Wiley, Bruno Rodriguez, Kam Yun Lee, and The Chinatown Housing and Land Development Task Force, Individually and on Behalf of all others Similarly Situated, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Samuel R. PIERCE, in his Official Capacity as Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Robert C. Embry, in his Official Capacity as Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, Marvin Siflinger, in his Official Capacity as Area Manager, Boston Area Office of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Robert Pacquin, in his Capacity as Area Director of Community Planning and Management in the Boston Area Office, Kevin H. White, in his Capacity as Mayor of the City of Boston, and Robert Ryan, in his Official Capacity as Executive Director of the Boston Redevelopment Authority, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

August 17, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Albert W. Wallis, Greater Boston Legal Services, Laura Monroe, Greater Boston Elderly Legal Services, Frank I. Smizik, Mass. Law Reform Institute, Boston, Mass., for plaintiffs.

Marcia Drake Seeler, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Boston, Mass., for defendants White and Ryan.

Keith M. Werhan, Andrew M. Wolfe, Civ. Div. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendant Landrieu.

Keith M. Werhan, Washington, D. C., for all remaining defendants.


MEMORANDUM

CAFFREY, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs, seven individuals and an unincorporated organization, the Chinatown Housing and Land Development Task Force, are before the Court challenging federal funding for the development of a project known as "Copley Place." The plaintiffs, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, sue the Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and other federal officials, as well as two officials of the City...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases