1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 521 F.Supp.
  5. 521 F.Supp. 164 (1981)
 

MEAD DIGITAL SYSTEMS, INC. v. A. B. DICK CO.

Nos. C-3-78-177, C-3-78-287.

521 F.Supp. 164 (1981)

MEAD DIGITAL SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. A. B. DICK COMPANY and Gould, Inc., Defendants. A. B. DICK COMPANY and Gould, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. The MEAD CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, S. D. Ohio, W. D.

August 7, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David C. Greer, Howard P. Krisher, Dayton, Ohio, Dugald S. McDougall, Keith V. Rockey, Chicago, Ill., for A. B. Dick Company & Gould, Inc.

Armistead W. Gilliam, Jr., Dayton, Ohio, Bill Durkee, Edward W. Goldstein, Ben D. Tobor, Houston, Tex., for Mead Corp.

OPINION

PRELIMINARY MATTERS DISPOSED OF; A. B. DICK NOT PRECLUDED FROM PROSECUTING INFRINGEMENT ACTION BY LACHES; MEAD DIJIT PRINTER HELD NOT TO INFRINGE, LITERALLY OR AS AN EQUIVALENT, ON CLAIMS 1 OR 33 OF SWEET PATENT OR ON CLAIM 2 OF LEWIS-BROWN PATENT; SWEET PATENT DEEMED VALID; LEWIS-BROWN PATENT DEEMED INVALID; DEFENDANT TO PREPARE JUDGMENT ENTRY WITHIN STATED PERIOD OF TIME IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS OPINION

RICE, District Judge.

I...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases