MALO v. WILLIS

Docket No. 25024.

126 Cal.App.3d 543 (1981)

178 Cal. Rptr. 774

MICHAEL JOHN MALO, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RAY EUGENE WILLIS, Defendant and Appellant. THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RAY EUGENE WILLIS, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

December 7, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Mac Lachlan, Burford & Arias and Clifford R. Cunningham for Defendant and Appellant.

Robinson, Robinson, Pike, Hahn & Philipson, John D. Rowell, James J. Vonk, Richard A. Krimen, Arthur Hershenson and Douglas Cramoline for Plaintiffs and Respondents.


OPINION

THE COURT.*

The issue presented by this appeal is whether a California highway patrolman's personal injury action is barred by the fireman's rule. After the motion of defendant Ray Eugene Willis for summary judgment was granted, plaintiffs Michael John Malo and the State of California moved for reconsideration. The trial court granted reconsideration, vacated a judgment entered while the reconsideration...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases