Judgment affirmed.
On this appeal defendant argues: (1) that the known substance relied on for comparative tests was not established as reliable by either of the testifying experts and (2) that comment in the prosecutor's summation on the failure of defendant or witnesses on his behalf to contradict the testimony of the police officer deprived him of a fair trial. As to the reliability of the known substance as a comparative
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.