SNELLING & SNELLING v. GOYDEN


181 N.J. Super. 479 (1981)

438 A.2d 353

SNELLING & SNELLING, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MARYANN E. GOYDEN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 5, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. Barry Rank argued the cause for appellant (Weston, Kravitz & Rank, attorneys; Michael T. Hartsough on the brief).

Lawrence F. O'Hara, respondent, argued the cause pro se (Lefkowitz & O'Hara, attorneys).

Before Judges MICHELS and J.H. COLEMAN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by J.H. COLEMAN, J.A.D.

This appeal raises the question of whether a county district court can or should permit a litigant to proceed by way of an ex parte order to show cause why an employer should not be held in contempt for refusing to honor a wage execution. We hold the county district court can and should entertain such a procedure.

A brief statement of the essential facts is necessary for a clear understanding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases