1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Commw.
  4. 62 Pa.Commw.
  5. 62 Pa.Commw. 3 (1981)
 

WEINSTOCK v. UNEMPL. COMP. BD. OF REVIEW.

No. 2188 C.D. 1980.

62 Pa.Commw. 3 (1981)

Gisela Weinstock, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

September 18, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leonard S. Lipson, for petitioner.

William Kennedy, Assistant Attorney General, with him Richard Wagner, Chief Counsel, Robert F. Skwaryk, Associate Counsel, and LeRoy S. Zimmerman, Attorney General, for respondent.

Argued August 24, 1981, before Judges ROGERS, BLATT and MacPHAIL, sitting as a panel of three.

PER CURIAM, September 18, 1981:

The claimant in this unemployment compensation case contends that the finding of the Board of Review that she had not given her employer prior notices of proposed absences from work during the period of five days in violation of the employer's work rules (for which she was discharged) is not supported by competent evidence, that is, evidence that was not hearsay. We have carefully reviewed the record and find this contention to be without...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases