KIKKERT v. KIKKERT


177 N.J. Super. 471 (1981)

427 A.2d 76

MARTIN KIKKERT, JR., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ELIZABETH KIKKERT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 10, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry Ramer argued the cause for appellant.

Ledislas F. Feher argued the cause for respondent.

Before Judges FRITZ, POLOW and JOELSON.


The opinion of the court was delivered by POLOW, J.A.D.

This appeal involves another intricate and perplexing equitable distribution problem which we have not addressed in a reported appellate opinion. We are called upon to decide whether a "vested" pension plan which will provide future monetary benefits to plaintiff husband is equitably distributable. His pension rights are vested in that he will be entitled to enjoy the financial benefits in or about 1990 when...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases