BOARD OF REGENTS v. WISCONSIN PERS. COMM.

Nos. 80-1411, 80-1684.

103 Wis.2d 545 (1981)

309 N.W.2d 366

BOARD OF REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM, State of Wisconsin, Petitioner-Respondent, v. WISCONSIN PERSONNEL COMMISSION, State of Wisconsin, and Steven Dropik, Appellants. Edwin YOUNG, President, University of Wisconsin System, Petitioner-Respondent and Cross-Respondent, v. PERSONNEL COMMISSION, Respondent and Cross-Appellant. Chester MILLER, Petitioner-Appellant and Cross-Respondent, v. PERSONNEL COMMISSION, Respondent and Cross-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided June 25, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For appellant Dropik there were briefs by Richard V. Graylow and P. Scott Hassett of Lawton & Cates of Madison, and oral argument by Mr. Graylow.

For appellant Wisconsin Personnel Commission there were briefs by Daphne Webb of Jacobs, Webb & Weiden, of Madison, and oral argument by Ms. Webb.

For petitioner-appellant and cross-respondent Chester Miller the cause was argued by Bruce K. Kaufmann of Jenswold, Studt, Hanson, Clark & Kaufmann of Madison.

For respondent and cross-appellant Personnel Commission the cause was argued by Milo G. Flaten of Madison.

For petitioner-respondent Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, State of Wisconsin, there was a brief by Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and Maureen McGlynn, assistant attorney general, and oral argument by Ms. McGlynn.

For petitioner-respondent and cross-respondent Edwin Young, President, University of Wisconsin System, the cause was argued by Ms. McGlynn.

Before Decker, C.J., Moser, P.J., and Cannon, J.


DECKER, C.J.

These appeals present the question whether a probationary employe in the classified civil service of the state of Wisconsin may appeal his discharge to the Personnel Commission. We conclude that the Personnel Commission has no subject-matter jurisdiction of such appeals and affirm the circuit court.

The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System (University) petitioned for review pursuant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases