1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 304 N.W.2d
  5. 304 N.W.2d 335 (1981)
 

SIEGEL v. EMPIRE SAV. BANK

No. 51393.

304 N.W.2d 335 (1981)

Harold and Margot SIEGEL, Appellants, v. EMPIRE SAVINGS BANK, Respondent. EMPIRE SAVINGS BANK, Respondent, v. BIO-REALTY, INC., Appellant, Brookdale Ten Investment Co., Appellant, Twin City Federal Savings and Loan Association, Defendant, Harold and Margot Siegel, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

April 3, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cox & Goudy and Charles A. Cox, Minneapolis, for Bio-Realty, Inc., and Harold and Margot Siegel.

Samuel Saliterman and Richard H. Porter, Minneapolis, for Brookdale Ten Investment Co.

Dorsey, Windhorst, Hannaford, Whitney & Halladay and Robert Bayer, Minneapolis, for Empire Sav. Bank.

Mackall, Crounse & Moore and Eric O. Madson, Minneapolis, for Twin City Federal Sav. & Loan Assn.

OTIS, Justice.

This matter is before the court in response to an order of the United States District Court, dated April 13, 1980, a copy of which is appended hereto, certifying for our determination the following question of law:

Is [the following provision of a mortgage] paragraph 19, involving a sale of commercial property by a contract for deed,

a) void per se, or

b) enforceable per se, or

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases