Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Petitioner's naked offer of certified copies of the State equalization rates on the issue of inequality was patently insufficient and was properly rejected by Special Term. In the absence of any evidence serving to justify the use of the State rates within the taxing unit, there was no basis for accepting the petitioner's offer of proof (see Guth Realty v Gingold,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.