Whether the actions of the mental hospital and its physicians with respect to retaining petitioner as a patient were or were not strictly correct, there is nothing to indicate that the criticisms that are made by the dissent represent either a general or repetitive practice or policy of respondent rather than merely what happened with respect to this one patient, as to whom the case is clearly moot. There is, therefore, no...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
