LEER v. CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & P. RY. CO.

No. 50915.

308 N.W.2d 305 (1981)

William E. LEER, Appellant, v. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

Rehearing Denied August 14, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Yaeger & Yaeger, J. Howard Hill and William G. Jungbauer, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Rider, Bennett, Egan & Arundel, Roger R. Roe, Jr., and Kevin C. Dooley, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Hvass, Weismann & King and Reed K. Mackenzie, Minneapolis, for Minnesota Trial Lawyers Assn.

Heard, considered and decided by the court en banc.


SCOTT, Justice.

The Dakota County District Court certified the following question to this court as important and doubtful:1

Are witness statements obtained by a defendant from non-managerial employees who were working with plaintiff at the time of his accident discoverable by plaintiff under Rule 26.02(3), Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure, or are the same protected from discovery under a claim of attorney-client privilege?<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases