Plaintiff was a passenger in the Barnett car when it skidded into the rear of a car owned by Watkins and driven by Esannason. The jury, faced by conflicting versions of the accident, credited that of Barnett and discredited that of Esannason. Its verdict should not have been disturbed by the trial court unless it could not be supported by any fair interpretation of the evidence (Olsen v Chase Manhattan Bank,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.