PUGH v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO

Docket No. 19851.

119 Cal.App.3d 485 (1981)

174 Cal. Rptr. 19

JACK L. PUGH et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

May 27, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Saulque & Viets and Richard E. Saulque for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

James P. Jackson, City Attorney, and Theodore H. Kobey, Jr., Assistant City Attorney, for Defendants and Respondents.


OPINION

CARR, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered after the demurrer of respondent City of Sacramento (City) to appellants' class action complaint was sustained without leave to amend.

The sole issue on appeal is whether the provisions of article XIII A of the California Constitution, prohibiting a city from enacting an ordinance imposing a transaction or sales tax on the sale of real property within...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases