1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 177 N.J.
  5. 177 N.J. Super. 412 (1981)
 

KAZMER-STANDISH, ETC. v. SCHOEFFEL INSTRUMENT

177 N.J. Super. 412 (1981)

426 A.2d 1061

KAZMER-STANDISH CONSULTANTS, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. SCHOEFFEL INSTRUMENT CORP. AND KRATOS, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 19, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dennis W. Blake argued the cause for appellant (Friedland & Rudolph, attorneys).

Michael S. Meisel argued the cause for respondents (Cole, Berman & Belsky, attorneys; Michael S. Meisel and Gerald H. Gline on the brief).

Before Judges BOTTER, KING and McELROY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, J.A.D.

Plaintiff Kazmer-Standish Consultants, Inc. (Kazmer), a Cleveland, Ohio, company, styles itself as "management consultants on mergers and acquisitions." It brought an action in the Law Division against Schoeffel Instrument Corporation, a Westwood, New Jersey manufacturer of scientific instruments, and Kratos, Inc., a California conglomerate, to collect a $100,000 business broker's or finder's fee. Plaintiff alleged...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases