1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ill.
  4. 99 Ill.
  5. 99 Ill. App.3d 473 (1981)
 

CITY OF CHICAGO v. PRUS

No. 80-2043.

99 Ill. App.3d 473 (1981)

425 N.E.2d 426

THE CITY OF CHICAGO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOUIS PRUS et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Appellate Court of Illinois — First District (5th Division).

Supplemental opinion filed on denial of rehearing September 11, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William R. Quinlan, Corporation Counsel, of Chicago (Robert R. Retke, Philip L. Bronstein, and Myron N. Schreiber, Assistant Corporation Counsel, of counsel), for appellant.

John W. Lally, of Chicago, for appellees.

Reversed and remanded.

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE SULLIVAN delivered the opinion of the court:

The sole issue presented in this appeal is whether the trial court, in granting defendants' motion to dismiss, erred in finding a municipal ordinance unconstitutional.

It appears that plaintiff city of Chicago enacted a for-sale sign ban ordinance (ordinance) prohibiting any person from placing or maintaining "For Sale" or "Sold" signs in designated residential...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases