SHULMAN, Presiding Judge.
Defendant appeals his conviction of the offense of child molestation on the ground that the evidence, as a matter of law, did not support a finding of guilty.
Although defendant presented evidence to the contrary, there was direct eyewitness testimony of the defendant's commission of the unlawful act in addition to the inculpatory testimony of the victim herself. We conclude, therefore, that a rational trier of fact could reasonably...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
