1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 178 N.J.
  5. 178 N.J. Super. 380 (1981)
 

HARMUTH ENG. v. FRANKLIN UNIVERSAL BLDG. CORP.

178 N.J. Super. 380 (1981)

HARMUTH ENGINEERING COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. FRANKLIN UNIVERSAL BUILDING CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 25, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bennett Wasserstrum argued the cause for appellant.

Kent A.F. Weisert and Warren B. Kasdan argued the cause for respondent (Schwartz, Steinberg, Tobia, Stanziale & Gordon, attorneys; Warren B. Kasdan on the brief).

Before Judges BISCHOFF, MILMED and FRANCIS.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal challenges an order dated August 31, 1979 confirming an arbitration award and entering final judgment on behalf of plaintiff.

Defendant Franklin Universal Building Corporation and plaintiff Harmuth Engineering Company entered into a contract for the performance of construction work in Fairfield, New Jersey. Incorporated in the contract was a provision submitting all "disputes, claims or questions under the contract to binding arbitration...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases