SOGNIER, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of armed robbery. He appeals, both pro se and through counsel, the trial court's denial of his motion for new trial.
1. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in failing to grant a new trial because the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. Two eyewitnesses (one of whom was the victim) identified appellant as the individual who had approached them with a sawed-off shotgun, forced them to lay on the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.