The question presented on appeal is whether Special Term, upon a motion for summary judgment, erred in holding that defendant's parol evidence was admissible to prove a condition precedent to the effectiveness of a written agreement.
This appeal arises out of an action commenced by plaintiff for damages allegedly sustained as a result of defendant's failure to deliver a 1978 Limited Edition Chevrolet
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.