1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 118 Cal.App.3d
  5. 118 Cal.App.3d 411 (1981)
 

TRUMP v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. 19880.

118 Cal.App.3d 411 (1981)

173 Cal. Rptr. 403

DAN TRUMP et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY, Respondent; JEANETTE PELKEY, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

April 28, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Joseph E. Burke and Eric O. Larsen for Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

Reed & Samuel and James S. Reed for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

REYNOSO, J.

In this proceeding for a writ of prohibition, we are called upon to construe the statutory provisions governing mandatory judicial arbitration. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 1141.10-1141.32;1 Cal. Rules of Court, rules 1600-1617.) Specifically, we must determine whether a postarbitration request for trial which is limited to certain issues presented by the action may be heard on limited...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases