HYGRADE FOOD PRODUCTS v. W. C. A. B. ET AL.

No. 3040 C.D. 1980.

62 Pa.Commw. 448 (1981)

Hygrade Food Products, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board and Doris Royster, Respondents.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

November 19, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul R. Brady, III, Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman and Goggin, for petitioner.

Richard K. Teitell, Felgoise & Teitell, for respondent, Doris Royster.

Argued September 18, 1981, before Judges BLATT, CRAIG and MacPHAIL, sitting as a panel of three.


OPINION BY JUDGE MacPHAIL, November 19, 1981:

In this appeal, Hygrade Food Products (Petitioner) seeks reversal of a decision by the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed a referee's decision that Doris Royster (Claimant) was permanently disabled as a result of injuries sustained while employed by Petitioner. We affirm.

Claimant was employed as a hot dog selector by the Petitioner. Her duties involved observation of the hot dogs as they...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases