1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.2d
  4. 111 Misc.2d
  5. 111 Misc.2d 396 (1981)
 

KAREN v. STATE OF N Y

111 Misc.2d 396 (1981)

Joel S. Karen, Claimant, v. State of New York, Defendant. (Claim No. 65358.) Samuel J. Roth, Claimant, v. State of New York, Defendant. (Claim No. 65489.) Frank M. Hudak, Claimant, v. State of New York, Defendant. (Claim No. 65524.)

Court of Claims.

November 6, 1981

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Seth D. Corwin of counsel), for defendant. Tellerman, Paticoff & Greenberg for claimants.

FRANK S. ROSSETTI, J.

Motions are granted and the three claims are hereby dismissed, in accordance with the following.

The Karen and Hudak claims are identical (they were prepared by the same attorneys, said claimants' attorneys herein) and are for false arrest and malicious prosecution. The Roth claim (prepared by different attorneys) is for malicious prosecution, prima facie tort and violation of civil rights.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases