Per Curiam.
The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on February 4, 1921.
The Referee sustained several allegations of misconduct including: (1) neglecting two legal matters entrusted to him by failing to promptly institute actions on behalf of his clients; (2) knowingly conducting a spurious defense and delaying a trial solely to harass a former client; (3)
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.