MALONEY v. PAC


183 Conn. 313 (1981)

MARY MALONEY v. STANLEY J. PAC ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decision released March 17, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James A. Wade, for the appellant (defendant Legislative Regulation Review Committee).

Christopher M. Royston, with whom, on the brief, was Robert N. Wienner, for the appellant (defendant Balf Company).

Frank Rogers, assistant attorney general, for the appellees (named defendant et al.).

Pamela R. Hershinson, with whom was Robert B. Shapiro, for the appellee (plaintiff).

Alexander A. Goldfarb, corporation counsel, and James F. Meehan, special assistant corporation counsel, with whom on the brief, were Dennis L. Pieragostini and James J. Szerejko, assistant corporation counsels, and Paula Zeiner, for the appellee (defendant city of Hartford).

BOGDANSKI, PETERS, HEALEY, ARMENTANO and WRIGHT, JS.


PETERS, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment that General Statutes § 4-170,1 permitting the legislature to veto administrative regulations, is unconstitutional. The plaintiff, Mary Maloney, brought an action against the state traffic commission and its members, and the city of Hartford and its acting city manager, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief from the legislative veto of action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases