1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.3d
  4. 29 Cal.3d
  5. 29 Cal.3d 462 (1981)
 

RICHMOND v. DART INDUSTRIES, INC.

Docket No. S.F. 24225.

29 Cal.3d 462 (1981)

629 P.2d 23

174 Cal. Rptr. 515

HAROLD H. RICHMOND et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. DART INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents; TAHOE DONNER ASSOCIATION, Intervener and Respondent.

Supreme Court of California.

June 15, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Harold A. Berliner, Richard F. Ellers, James L. Porter and Wood, Porter & Simon for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Severson, Werson, Berke & Melchior, Kurt W. Melchior, Jan T. Chilton, Kronick, Moskovitz, Tiedemann & Girard, Adolph Moskovitz and James E. Thompson for Defendants and Respondents.

Lawrence L. Hoffman and Hoffman & Linde for Intervener and Respondent.

OPINION

BIRD, C.J.

May a trial court deny a motion to certify a class if the defendants are able to show there was antagonism to the lawsuit on behalf of some absent class members? A secondary issue centers on whether the plaintiffs' prayer for rescission and punitive damages prevents the use of a class action suit.

I.

Tahoe Donner Subdivision is a recreational home site...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases