1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 66 Ohio
  5. 66 Ohio St. 2d 398 (1981)
 

YOUNGSTOWN SHEET & TUBE COMPANY v. MAHONING COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION

No. 80-1361.

66 Ohio St. 2d 398 (1981)

YOUNGSTOWN SHEET & TUBE COMPANY, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE, v. MAHONING COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES AND CROSS-APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 17, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur and Mr. Roger F. Day, for appellant and cross-appellee.

Messrs. Miller & Noga, Mr. Ronald B. Noga, Mr. Terry M. Miller, Mr. Vicent E. Gilmartin and Mr. Christopher Varley, for appellees and cross-appellants.

SWEENEY, J.

The sole question presented is whether the decision of the BTA was unreasonable or unlawful. R. C. 5717.04. We do not sit either as a "super" Board of Tax Appeals or as a trier of fact de novo. 3535 Salem Corp. v. Lindley (1979), 58 Ohio St.2d 210, 212.

Youngstown contends that the BTA's valuation of the subject property was, under the circumstances of this case, unreasonable and unlawful...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases