YEAGLEY, Associate Judge, Retired:
Appellant challenges the trial court's correction of an earlier, illegal sentence on the ground that it is harsher than the original sentence and so cannot survive constitutional attack. Finding appellant's contention unpersuasive, we affirm.
After a jury trial, appellant was found guilty of assault with intent to kill while armed (D.C.Code 1973, § 22-501, -3202), armed robbery (D.C.Code 1973, § 22-2901, -3202)...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.