1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 96 Wn.2d
  5. 96 Wn.2d 359 (1981)
 

NORTH STREET ASS'N v. OLYMPIA

Nos. 47061-8, 47469-9, 47529-6.

96 Wn.2d 359 (1981)

635 P.2d 721

NORTH STREET ASSOCIATION, ET AL, Appellants, v. THE CITY OF OLYMPIA, ET AL, Respondents. G-3 PROPERTIES, INC., ET AL, Respondents, v. THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF YAKIMA COUNTY, Respondent, DONALD M. BROWN, ET AL, Petitioners. GREATER KINGSGATE COUNCIL, INC., Appellant, v. KING COUNTY, ET AL, Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

October 29, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carroll, Kennedy, Schuck & Caplinger, P.S., by John James Watson and James J. Caplinger, for appellants North Street Ass'n, et al.

Ronald F. Whitaker (of Walters, Whitaker, Finney & Falk), for petitioners Brown.

Davis, Wright, Todd, Riese & Jones, by C. Keith Allred (counsel for appeal only) and Estep & Li, by Ronald G. Brown, for appellant Greater Kingsgate Council.

Mark O. Erickson, Alexander W. Mackie, and Owens, Weaver, Davies & Dominick, for respondents City of Olympia, et al.

Velikanje, Moore & Shore, Inc., P.S., by E.F. Velikanje, for respondents G-3 Properties, et al.

Jeffrey C. Sullivan, Prosecuting Attorney, and Louis Daniel Fessler, Deputy, for respondent Yakima County Board of Commissioners.

Norm Maleng, Prosecuting Attorney, and Stephen O. Kenyon, Deputy, for respondent King County.

Thom, Navoni, Hoff, Pierson & Ryder, by Richard W. Pierson, for respondents Century Homes, et al.

UTTER, J.

This is a consolidation of three cases. In each, the trial court dismissed a writ of review, challenging a plat approval decision, on the grounds that necessary parties had not been timely joined and/or served. For reasons that vary with each case, we reverse the appealed judgments.

In North Street Association v. City of Olympia, an application was filed for the approval of a subdivision in southeast Olympia. After several hearings, the city commission...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases