ARNOLD v. WILLIAMS

No. 79-444.

121 N.H. 333 (1981)

FRANCES P. ARNOLD v. THURSTON V. WILLIAMS

Supreme Court of New Hampshire.

May 7, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brighton, Fernald, Taft & Hampsey, of Peterborough (Silas Little, III, on the brief and orally), for the plaintiff.

McLane, Graf, Raulerson & Middleton, of Manchester (Robert A. Wells & a. on the brief and Mr. Wells orally), for the defendant.


PER CURIAM.

The defendant asserts that he has a right to use a section of road that runs across the plaintiff's property as either a public road established by prescription or a private right of way established by prescription. The master found that the defendant did not prove that he had such a right. Because it is not clear from the master's report that he used the correct rules of law in deciding that issue, we remand the case for redetermination of the question...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases