1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 85 N.J.
  5. 85 N.J. 363 (1981)
 

AUTOTOTE LTD. v. N.J. SPORTS & EXPO. AUTH.

85 N.J. 363 (1981)

427 A.2d 55

AUTOTOTE LIMITED, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. NEW JERSEY SPORTS AND EXPOSITION AUTHORITY AND AMERICAN TOTALISATOR COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 23, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joel H. Sterns argued the cause for appellant American Totalisator Company (Sterns, Herbert and Weinroth, attorneys; Joel H. Sterns and William J. Bigham on the briefs).

James R. Zazzali argued the cause for appellant New Jersey Sports and Exposition Authority (Zazzali, Zazzali and Whipple, attorneys).

Robert C. Epstein argued the cause for respondent (Hannoch, Weisman, Stern, Besser, Berkowitz and Kinney, attorneys).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by SULLIVAN, J.

The principal issue raised in this appeal is whether a negotiated five-year contract awarded by defendant New Jersey Sports and Exposition Authority (Authority) to defendant American Totalisator Company (Amtote), covering the installation and servicing of a totalisator system1 at the Meadowlands racetrack, violated the public bidding provisions of the New Jersey Sports and Exposition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases