ARNOLD, Judge.
The major issue as presented by defendant in this appeal is whether evidence of fluorescent particles found on defendant's body and clothing was erroneously admitted where none of the particles were retained for comparison or analysis.
The defendant argues that such evidence is "scientific" evidence requiring the State to establish relevance through proven testing procedures or "real" evidence which had to be preserved for comparison by the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
