1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 400 So.2d
  5. 400 So.2d 34 (1981)
 

ALDAMA v. STATE

No. 80-972.

400 So.2d 34 (1981)

Juan ALDAMA, George Casanova, and Bernardo Soto, Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Rehearing Denied July 10, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Essen & Spiegel and Eric B. Feldman, Coral Gables, for appellants.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Steven R. Jacob, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ., and PEARSON, TILLMAN (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgments of conviction upon a holding that (1) notwithstanding the defendants' claim that the witnesses called by the State at the suppression hearing were in hopeless conflict and were inherently incredible, no error is shown where the trial court's findings of fact, from which flowed the unassailed and unassailable conclusion of law that the search was valid, were supported by substantial competent evidence, Boykin v. State,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases