PEACHTREE DEVELOPMENT CO. v. PAUL

No. 81-92.

67 Ohio St. 2d 345 (1981)

PEACHTREE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, APPELLEE, v. PAUL ET AL., APPELLEES; COLERAIN TOWN MEETING ZONING COMMITTEE ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 29, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Santen, Santen & Hughes Co., L.P.A., and Mr. William B. Singer, for appellee Peachtree Development Company.

Mr. Robert G. Hyland, for appellants.

Mr. Simon L. Leis, Jr., prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Roger E. Friedman, for appellees Board of County Commissioners and Board of Elections.


Per Curiam.

The two critical issues in this case are (1) whether the board of county commissioners' approval of the CUP, which approval subjects the 164.5 acre tract to a standard of zoning different from that which existed prior to the approval, constitutes legislative action which is subject to a referendum in accordance with R. C. 303.12, and (2) whether Article XVI of the Hamilton County Zoning Resolution unlawfully delegates legislative authority to the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases