1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 83 A.D.2d
  5. 83 A.D.2d 305 (1981)
 

HARZINSKI v. VIL OF ENDICOTT

83 A.D.2d 305 (1981)

James Harzinski et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. Village of Endicott, Appellant-Respondent. (Action No. 1.) Samuel P. Russo et al., Appellants, v. City of Binghamton et al., Respondents. (Action No. 2.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

December 3, 1981

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ball & McDonough (Kevin F. McDonough of counsel), for respondents-appellants in Action No. 1 and appellants in Action No. 2.

Rodney A. Richards, for appellant-respondent in Action No. 1.

Kenneth Auerbach, Corporation Counsel, for City of Binghamton, respondent in Action No. 2.

MAHONEY, P. J., KANE, CASEY and WEISS, JJ., concur.

SWEENEY, J.

These appeals involve two separate actions for declaratory judgments regarding the amount of benefits that must be paid pursuant to subdivision 2 of section 207-a of the General Municipal Law by a municipality to disabled firemen who are receiving accidental disability retirement allowances. A resolution of the issues necessitates an analysis and interpretation of subdivision 2 of section 207-a of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases