Per Curiam.
Judgment entered February 14, 1980 affirmed, with $25 costs on the well-reasoned opinion of FREEDMAN, J., at Trial Term.
We note only that the nature of the copying work done did not point to any identifiable clients or principals for whom this defendant law firm might be viewed as the agent (cf. the contrary state of facts in J. P. & R. Adv. Agency v Glass, Greenberg, Irwin & Pellman, NYLJ, Dec. 7, 1979, p 5, col 1 [App Term...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
