Per Curiam.
The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on March 31, 1954.
In this proceeding to discipline him for professional misconduct, respondent was charged, inter alia, with intentionally deceiving a party to a proceeding in violation of sections 100.00 and 105.00 of the Penal Law and subdivision 1 of section 487 of the Judiciary Law by reason of his payment to another attorney of $2,000 to induce that attorney
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.