1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 96 Wn.2d
  5. 96 Wn.2d 201 (1981)
 

CATHCART v. SNOHOMISH COUNTY

No. 47493-1.

96 Wn.2d 201 (1981)

634 P.2d 853

CATHCART-MALTBY-CLEARVIEW COMMUNITY COUNCIL, ET AL, Appellants, v. SNOHOMISH COUNTY, ET AL, Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

October 8, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Smith, Brucker, Winn & Ehlert, Thomas H.S. Brucker, and Lynn D. Weir, for appellants.

Russ Juckett, Prosecuting Attorney, and Robert Terwilliger, Deputy, for respondent Snohomish County.

Edward Heavey, for respondent Hillis Homes, Inc.

Graham & Dunn, by Clemens H. Barnes and Robert A. Medved, for respondents Snohomish Cascade View Properties, et al.

Alhadeff, Leavitt & Wesley, by Stephen R. Powell, for respondent Nu Pacific Co.

UTTER, J.

This case involves cross appeals from a superior court judgment affirming a zoning change for two parcels of land in Snohomish County. One parcel, Silver Firs, consists of approximately 500 acres. The other, a 1,300-acre parcel, is known as Snohomish-Cascade. The developers of these properties intend to construct 6,000 residential units which may ultimately accommodate 19,000 people. The trial court approved the rezone and we believe properly so.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases