The issue on appeal is whether a contractual provision requiring the subcontractor "to hold [the contractor] harmless and to indemnify and protect [the contractor] against all damages, claims or demands arising out of the work covered by this contract" requires indemnification when the contractor is held liable to the owner under an indemnification clause in a separate contract.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.